A Business Incubator needs to have a
detailed business plan, which is updated regularly. This is
particularly important during the early star-up phase of an
Incubator.
A feasibility study will have identified
the need for the Incubator, established the extent of the market
for new businesses, and verified the size of the Incubator needed,
assessed the financial and other resources.
It supposes to:
- Confirm the feasibility study results
- Identify and resolve any remaining problem areas
- Set performance benchmarks
- Communicate the strategy with others
- Provide a template for management
BIIA recommends that the Incubator
business plan be developed by the Board and management team for the
following reasons:
- Facilitate understanding of the feasibility study
- Ensure the plan is within the interest and capacity of those
required to implement it
- Give a sense of ownership
- Enable easier updating
There are many examples of detailed
business plans prepared by external consultants that were not
followed by the organisation concerned because they did not
understand or “own” it. (External consultants, on the other hand,
generally best prepare Feasibility Studies).
The feasibility study, in consultation
with local stakeholders, will have determined the type, size and
management structure for the incubator appropriate to the
particular economic and other circumstances of the area.
The business plan should guide the set up
and detailed operation of the Incubator over a 3 to 5 year period.
It needs to be reviewed regularly and adjusted to meet changing
external factors new directions (flexible planning).
The Business Plan needs to address the
following
- A mission statement
- objectives (short, medium and longer term)
- Market Plan
- Target businesses
- Their specific needs
- How to attract them
- Pricing
- Occupancy levels
- Operating Plan
- Facilities
- Entry and exit policies
- Types and level of services
- Relations with other services
- Staffing
- Role of the Board
- Relationship with Stakeholders
- Financial Plans
- Capital budget
- Operational budget
- Cash flow projections
- Profit targets
Incubators differ and the business plan
should begin by setting out its objectives clearly in relation to
the type of Incubator.
Typical Incubator objectives are usually
given as some or all of the following:
- Reduction of business failure
- Employment creation
- Local economic development
- Regional development and diversification
- Import replacement
- Commercialisation of research
- Technology transfer
In terms of the incubation process, these
objectives are secondary.
The primary objective of a best practice
Incubator is to grow new businesses more successfully and more
quickly then would be the case if they did not receive Incubator
support.
The higher the number and the better the
quality of the businesses “hatched”, the better the secondary
outcomes: i.e. the more people employed, the better regional
economic outcomes, the more research commercialised etc.
Types of Incubator models currently
operating or being developed in Australia are:
- The standard independent model of 1500 to 2000 square metres of
usable space (more if accommodating industrial businesses and less
for office based) with free building on one or more sites catering
for a diverse range of tenants. Sometimes referred to as the
licorice all-sorts model.) NB: American literature suggests an area
of twice this size is needed in the USA; this is probably the
result of the combined effect of higher salaries and lower rentals
in that country.)
- The embedded (sometimes referred to as the “dependant” model),
a much smaller facility that is owned and operated by an
established organisation, which provides management or some other
services. This includes special purpose Incubators (e.g. high tech)
attached to a university or similar body, and a substantial number
of smaller “licorice all-sorts” facilities usually located in
smaller centres.
- The Incubator-Without-Walls (sometimes also referred to as a
Virtual Incubator). This concept is being developed for remote
parts of Australia but has not yet been tested in the field. The
businesses are not co-located but are linked by electronic means,
and receive the same level of support as they would if co-located.
They could be either of the licorice all-sorts or specialist
variety.
- The special purpose Incubator. This type of Incubator
specialises in a particular industry area, for example, fresh food
production, arts and craft manufacture, bio-technology,
aquaculture, Hi Tech (usually attached to a Research/Tertiary
Education Institution) and so on. They are sometimes more
specialised in the future, but as yet, specialist Incubators are
relatively scarce in Australia.
- Networked Incubators. This is a group of Incubators that
operate in different locations but are linked in some formal way.
For example, they may be owned/operated by the same organisation or
share staff.
As the principal income streams from
Incubators are rent, it is the area of flexible space that is
critical, not the number of units. Ideally the units should be
flexible so that the tenant businesses can grow or downsize easily.
A small number of larger tenants could occupy the same spaces as a
larger number of smaller tenants and still generate the same, say,
employment outcomes and a very similar income for the
Incubator.
NOTE: Real estate developments using the
term “Incubator” which do not have a process for tenants to
graduate, or do not focus on nurturing new business developments
are not Incubators. Such developments have a number of benefits for
local communities and operate on a commercial basis. Helping the
best tenants to graduate is commercial nonsense.
BIIA has established best practice
standards for Incubators in Australia.(Resources available through
BIIA
Administration)
THE
MARKET
The feasibility study will have identified
the market the Incubator is expected to meet. The business plan
should put in place a strategy to tap that market. Such strategies
might include:
- Informal marketing and advertising, especially word of mouth
and referrals by other support organisations (i.e. not paid
advertising. Local media, radio and TV stations are likely to
sponsor some free advertising).
- Local newspaper features
- Good promotional material (located in Accountants’ offices,
business training facilities and business support services,
advisory services etc).
The business plan should be adjusted if
market expectations are higher or lower.
The feasibility study would have
identified suitable buildings. The business plans will need to
address such issues as refurbishment and maintenance costs.
Low cost, secure, but flexible
partitioning is preferable to permanent partitions. If you have no
choice, try for a range of sizes so that businesses can move to
larger or smaller units as necessary.
Make sure the services area is central and
is positioned so that the tenants can make frequent and easy
contact.
Entry and Exit policies are often
developed during the feasibility stage, but the business plan
should address these. American best practices recognises four types
of Businesses Incubators. (Rice and Matthews, 1995):
- “up-and-comers” – businesses that show significant promise
that the incubation process “with intensive and persistent”
assistance can grow successfully.
- “superstars” – successful, fast growing businesses that
are getting ready to graduate but can still benefit from “selective
and strategic” assistance.
- “long shots” – businesses that benefit from being in an
Incubator but are not far enough in their development to “deserve
must time and attention” and
- “anchor tenants” – established businesses, government
agencies or community organisations that provide services to
tenants and / or help with cash flow but require “little time or
attention”.
In Australia there are also tenants who
are at a “pre-business stage” developing and market testing their
product / service. These must decide to go ahead and become full
businesses to abandon their idea. In the latter case they are not
classed as “business failures”.
Incubators need external support to do
well and this usually comes through sponsorship arrangements such
as:
- Government supply of land / buildings for peppercorn
rental
- Suppliers of office equipment (esp. computers, fax machines,
photocopiers and furniture)
- Subsidised rents (if occupying commercially leased
premises)
- Working bees for building maintenance / renovations
The business plan should include a
strategy for attracting sponsorship. These are trade-offs however.
Chasing sponsors at the expense of tenant services is
counterproductive for staff. A carefully selected Board should help
in attracting sponsorship.
Incubators work best when they are part of
regional strategy to support enterprise development. Local
professionals (accountants and lawyers), business advisory
services, government business support programmes, education bodies
should all be contacted. Some of these may have already been
identified as stakeholders during the feasibility process.
The business plan will need to specify
which services will be offered free, which will be on a pay as you
use basis and which will be included in the rent and the charging.
Issues such as whether to have a centralised telephone system (with
calls being handled by an employed receptionist or anchor tenant)
or no phone system can be critical to the financial viability of
the incubator.
A central phone system is expensive to
install, but provides opportunities for contact and support to the
emerging businesses. If properly managed, the phone system can
contribute to revenue stream of the incubator. Small Incubators may
be able to share the phone system with the sponsoring service.
Good quality and reliable photocopying
equipment, fax and computing facilities (if provided) should
produce surplus / profit to contribute to the Incubator’s financial
sustainability.
Sources of finance will have been
identified during the feasibility study along with cash-flow
projections, especially during the vulnerable “ramp-up” stage
(where costs exceed income while the Incubator is in the process of
reaching its optimum tenant level).
Much depends here on the way
self-sustainability is defined. Some Incubators base their plans on
having long-leases, rent free buildings and no other government
assistance and see this as being self-sustainable.
Except for the initial capital grant, some
Incubators see themselves as self-sustainable if they can meet all
their future capital requirements.
Some interpret self-sustaining to mean “no
additional sources of funding over that usually provided”.
Situations vary greatly, but best practice
Incubators are those that operate as close to being businesses
themselves. Thus the less long-term dependence on government
funding the better.
However, it needs to be understood that in
Australia, at least to date, no true Incubator can operate on fully
commercial principles. (there are claims that it can be done using
high risk venture capital, selecting businesses in such areas as,
for example, bio-technology where the potential returns are
enormous, the lead times are around the 10 year mark, the Incubator
takes substantial equity in the project, and four out of five
business failures are expected, but..)
Even though BIIA recommends consultants
NOT be used for developing business plans, it is recognised that
this is not always possible, especially if the proponents of the
incubator plan to recruit expert board members and hire experienced
staff once the funding has been secured. (A reliable feasiblity
study and well developed business plan is prerequisites for
funding.)
BIIA makes available a list of consultants
experience in undertaking feasibility studies, incubator business
plans and Incubator evaluations who have been registered with BIIA
(and any available brochures etc. we have on these consultants). To
be registered, BIIA satisfies itself that the consultant(s) has
worked with Business Incubators in the past and has previously
undertaken at least one satisfactory Incubator study.
BIIA is unable to recommend a specific
consultant, and those wishing to engage a consultant to undertake a
business plan or assess a proposal should check the following:
- knowledge and experience of incubators
- understanding of the incubation process
- access to data relating to the area where the Incubator is to
be located
- personal skills to be able to draw in potential stakeholders,
and
- other commitments, time scales and price
- written references from previous clients (followed up if
necessary).
Interviewing prospective consultants would
enable a judgement to be made about his / her personal
capacities.
For new Incubators: If using external
consultants to develop a business plan, Incubator proponents should
ensure that a consultant is selected that has the capacity to
produce a business plan that matches the scale of the Incubator
project and the level of skill of those required to implement
it.